
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
latest_posts
- 1
Step by step instructions to Keep up with the Life span of Your Kona SUV's Battery Duration - 2
How HIV/AIDS got its name − the words Americans used for the crisis were steeped in science, stigma and religious language - 3
Pat Finn, actor from 'The Middle,' dies at 60 after bladder cancer diagnosis - 4
Mummified cheetahs found in Saudi caves shed light on lost populations - 5
The Following Huge Thing: 5 Progressive Tech New businesses
What you need to know about flu treatments as cases spike across the US
Grasping the Basics of Business Land Regulation
Poll: 62% of Americans would oppose U.S. military action in Greenland
'We need everyone,' wounded reservist urges Knesset panel to advance haredi draft law
Impact of NIH funding reductions felt in cancer and infectious disease trials
Becoming Familiar with an Unknown dialect: My Language Learning Excursion
Cuba says 33 have died of mosquito-borne illnesses as epidemic rages
Flights canceled at 40 U.S. airports: Follow live updates as FAA cuts to air traffic take effect amid government shutdown
Putting pig organs in people is OK in the US, but growing human organs in pigs is not – why is that?













